Two FASHION staffers focus on what may go down this Sunday night time
The ranks right here at FASHION aren’t crammed with males. Shocking, proper? But there are one or two (there are literally, actually, two). Naturally, when a query about male/feminine dynamics arises it’s solely truthful that considered one of them stand in for the members of his gender and supply some perception. Our final subject of dialog was the tweet from Canada’s former PM Kim Campbell about why girls on tv information shouldn’t put on sleeveless attire, and as we speak we’re discussing the chance of woke political moments at the first Oscars of the #MeToo period. Two of our staffers—from the males’s nook, Greg Hudson, and from the girls’s, Pahull Bains—speak it out.
GH: This weekend, it’s the Oscars. It’s mainly Christmas for tradition critics (I’ve determined to name us that, as a result of it’s each self-important and alliterative). This yr, although, issues really feel a little bit completely different. It’s not simply that the ceremony is occurring amidst some fraught socio-political occasions–that’s occurred earlier than. In truth, I bear in mind how Tom Cruise (rocking some very delicate braces at the time) opened the Oscars that occurred after 9/11 with a rousing speech, primarily justifying everybody’s presence and participation in what was, relative to the largest terrorist assault perpetrated on US soil, a reasonably self-indulgent and audacious occasion. “And what about a night like tonight? Should we celebrate the magic that movies bring?” he requested, rhetorically. “Well, dare I say it, more than ever!” But this yr, the controversy is coming from inside the home. It’s onerous for the movie trade to take a stand with out wanting a bit hypocritical. And that’s not simply with regard to the #MeToo and Time’s Up actions. It’s additionally due to the Florida capturing and the elevated strain for gun management. While it’s been confirmed that there isn’t technically a link between consuming violent media and finishing up violent acts, movies have actually added to a tradition that glorifies weapons, making them that a lot more durable to regulate. So, how ought to the Oscars deal with themselves? What ought to we hope to see?
PB: With Jimmy Kimmel as host, I’m hoping for some fairly politically-aware and culturally important moments, whether or not in his monologue, jokes or the presenters’ statements. But based on an interview with Jennifer Todd, considered one of the lead producers of the Academy Awards, in the New York Times, the Academy has different plans. “We want to make it as entertaining as possible — reverential and respectful but also fun and emotional,” she mentioned. “The Oscars should be a spectacle. Fun and funny and great performances. It should also be a giant commercial for the movie business, which we all need to keep going.”
That’s about as on-the-nose as you will get. “A giant commercial for the movie business” mainly means: “Hey Hollywood, stay in your lane. Talk movies, not movements.” But guys, this isn’t Jimmy Fallon internet hosting. It’s Kimmel. In this batshit-crazy Trump Era, he’s been on a mission. Vanity Fair has billed him as “a reluctant progressive hero,” the New York Times says “he eviscerated the latest Republican health care bill on his show,” and the Hollywood Reporter reported that “Jimmy Kimmel Live! is the only 11:35 p.m. telecast up by both key measures this season, with viewership up by nine percent and his showing among adults 18-49 up by four percent.”
Which is all a longwinded manner for me to say—I don’t see this man backing down. Not with such a serious platform at his disposal. So regardless of what the Academy Award producers are hoping for, or attempting to drive the night’s agenda towards, my cash’s nonetheless on Kimmel for delivering the wokest awards present of the season. (I imply, he’s been a visitor at considered one of Pod Save America’s reside reveals which is nearly as left-leaning as humanly doable.) Though the #metoo motion continues to be fairly entrance and heart, the Weinstein whirlwind appears to have died down considerably, so I’m anticipating much less Harvey jokes and extra basic commentary on the predatory nature of the trade. And you’re proper—there’s undoubtedly going to be one thing on gun management. Maybe even a shock cameo by Emma Gonzalez of ‘We Call BS’ fame? (Fun truth: CNN lately reported that the Parkland scholar has extra Twitter followers than the NRA. You go, woman.)
GH: I do suppose Kimmel is an efficient host for this second. Until this yr, he wasn’t actually counted amongst the massive Hollywood Liberals, and so his change towards politics has been sort of inspiring. His activism looks like it comes from a real place, and like he’d actually reasonably not must do something. He agreed to host once more earlier than his political flip, so it’s fortunate.
Still, a part of me thinks it’s simply as effectively if the Oscars didn’t wade into the political/social realm. Not as a result of I wouldn’t agree with what they are saying, or as a result of I feel that actors, just by dint of being actors, are disqualified from speaking about actual points. But as a result of it could actually so simply come off as crass and self-congratulatory–I imply, it’s an award present, so clearly it’s going to be self-congratulatory. But, you realize what I imply. It’s onerous to appear honest about gender equality and gun management once you’re carrying a robe when you hand out little golden statues.
And whereas I’ve little question that most individuals at the Oscars are legitimately involved about gender equality (particularly the girls) and holding kids protected (particularly the dad and mom), as a result of the Internet’s outrage meter is so primed, talking out for or towards something turns into a efficiency that can be adjudicated in actual time. It’s like once you’re pressured to learn Slaughterhouse-Five in highschool and so that you hate it, although it’s truly an superior e book and beneath regular circumstances you’d adore it. If everybody presenting feels strain to show their woke-ness, even when they’re legit woke, it is going to really feel pressured and hole. Also, I by no means needed to learn Slaughterhouse-Five in highschool. But I suppose one thing is best than nothing.
And but, talking of nothing: it additionally feels hole as a result of the trade wasn’t solely the place the place the MeToo motion sort of started–and thus a serious a part of the downside–however as a result of it’s nonetheless doing that factor the place it picks and chooses who ought to be punished based mostly on…I don’t truly know what it’s based mostly on. What I do know is that Gary Oldman is nearly actually going to win an Oscar for Best Actor, regardless of some shady (alleged) behaviour in his historical past. Truthfully, the try by some media organizations to convey up offensive issues Oldman mentioned felt a bit like courting controversy for the sake of the clicks, however the potential home violence is one other story. Casey Affleck has properly declined to attend as a result of he is aware of he’s fortunate he wasn’t nominated this yr, when individuals would have taken the accusations of sexual harassment towards him extra severely. And but, they are going to be celebrating Gary Oldman. It sort of seems like the Entertainment Industry is just too soiled to inform anybody to maintain clear.
PB: Well, such as you mentioned, this time the name is coming from inside the constructing. So removed from it coming off as hypocritical for actors to take an ethical/social/political stand whereas accepting statuettes for his or her work in the trade, I see it as crucial. If individuals from inside the trade aren’t going to attempt to deal with or repair its issues, why ought to anybody else care? And on the subject of points exterior of the trade, like gun management or sexual assault/abuse as a broader cultural downside (versus a Hollywood downside), who higher than celebrities with hundreds of thousands of followers and actual, tangible clout to attempt to provoke change? The complete Gary-Oldman-being-celebrated factor is disappointing although. A step ahead in a single course, and backward in one other. But, effectively, I assume change by no means comes simple, or suddenly.
By the manner, I’m curious to see how celebrities navigate the Ryan Seacrest situation. He’s simply been accused by his private stylist of repeated sexual harassment, over a interval of seven years, and whereas I utterly agree with Kimmel, who mentioned in an interview with Variety that “we should at the very least afford people the opportunity for truth,” this allegation will definitely make for a really fascinating crimson carpet. Jennifer Lawrence, for one, appears to be fairly conflicted, saying on an interview with Howard Stern that she may simply skip an interview with Seacrest at the Oscars, and that she “[doesn’t] know” fairly what to conclude about the complete situation. I ponder if both E! or Seacrest will launch any form of assertion forward of the ceremony, or if he’ll deal with it in any respect on digital camera. Either manner, he’s undoubtedly going to be on tenterhooks all through, most likely afraid of one other viral Debra-Messing-calling-out-E-on-E second.
GH: That has the making of a really awkward crimson carpet. Though, I suppose, after a long time of asking actresses inane questions that put them on the spot, it’s a bit satisfying that they could get to ask Seacrest tough questions. I feel, if I had been him I’d sit the crimson carpet out, perhaps be considered one of the individuals holding issues transferring in the studio. But then, I’ve lined one crimson carpet in my life (and technically it was truly pink) and I’d search for any excuse to get out of it if I used to be speculated to do it once more.
Also talking of Seacrest: have you ever seen that of the males who’ve been accused, the ones with lone accusers have stayed in the information cycle for the shortest time period? It’s apparent that the extra victims there are, the extra clearly a sample is established, and the larger the information story can be. It’s simple to disregard one voice. And so I may completely see Seacrest simply hoping this story can be smothered by Oscar stuff. But additionally, so typically pundits speak about how harmful this local weather of accusation is for poor, wrongly accused males, however as the motion has chugged alongside, it looks like the court docket of public opinion has began to perhaps work? While believing those that come ahead ought to be the default response, the baseless witch hunt hasn’t actually materialized. It’s like we naturally sort of anticipate good reportage earlier than we utterly tear down a profession. That is likely to be onerous for some victims who don’t have entry to a New York Times reporter, nevertheless it’s sort of a good verify towards what some individuals (and all of France) nervous can be finish of males on the whole.
Final query: How lengthy do you suppose it is going to take for some studio to make a movie about the complete #MeToo motion? It’ll be like Spotlight, solely with extra celebs. Actually, perhaps it’s extra of a TV factor. It’s onerous for film stars to play different film stars. Although, I really feel like Anne Hathaway may play a reasonably imply Rose McGowan.
PB: Oh it’s going to occur. But we’re nonetheless proper in the eye of the storm, so I don’t know what that film would even be. Not sufficient has occurred but, so wouldn’t it simply be a endless reel of younger, stunning actresses being despatched as much as Harvey Weinstein’s room? (Yikes.) How wouldn’t it even finish? I assume we’ve acquired to reside via a bit extra of it to have a whole story to inform. Legit query although—which studio would again it?! It would most likely must be a very aboveboard, no-skeletons-in-our-closet, wholly-female-led manufacturing. Paging Reese Witherspoon’s firm…